DURGA PRASAD AND ORS. Vs. SMT. TULSA DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners against the order dated 12.12.2008 by which the prescribed authority has rejected the application filed by the Petitioners under Section 34(i) of the Act for giving reply to the interrogatories by the Respondent.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that intention of the Petitioners is not to delay the proceedings and he has relied upon the judgment rendered in Sohan Singh v. Maiku Lal reported in, 1975 A.L.R. 528 wherein the Court has held that: