BRIJ NANDAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) CONSIDERING the pure legal submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel states that he does not propose to file any counter-affidavit and the writ petition may be disposed of finally at this stage under the Rules of this Court.

(3.) LEARNED Standing Counsel having gone through the impugned order could not support the impugned orders.