MAHENDRA YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE prayer for bail in these connected appeals is being considered and disposed of by means of this common order.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

(3.) CONSIDERING all the aspects of the case and without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, we are of the view that no case for bail is made out in favour of the applicant Mahendra Yadav, Consequently, the prayer for bail of the applicant Mahendra Yadav is hereby rejected. So far as appellant Ravindra Yadav is concerned as causing the fatal fire arm injuries is not attributed to him, we are of the view that he should be released on bail. Let the appellant Ravindra Yadav convicted in S.T. No. 105 of 2006, under section 302/34 IPC and 25 Arms Act, P.S. Bhadohi, District Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi) be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.