PARMESHWAR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SHRI Narayan Shukla, J.:- Heard Mr. D.K. Dikshit, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

(2.) THE petitioners have challenged the summoning order dated 07.09.1996 on the ground that the complainant submitted the list of witnesses total as 130, but produced only 16 witnesses for examination, whereas he is under obligation to produce all the witnesses as listed in the list provided by him.

(3.) IN light of the aforesaid settled view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, I am of the view that the proceeding of the court below does not suffer from error and, therefore, the impugned summoning order does not warrant interference by this Court and the petition is dismissed.