SUSHEEL TIWARI Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAJESH Chandra, J- Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, Sri K.K. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State and pe ­rused the record. The learned Counsel for the applicant pointed out that the co-accused Ashok Tiwari who had opened fire, which did not hit the deceased, was granted bail by this Court whereas the role assigned to the ac ­cused applicant is that of exhortation.

(2.) THE learned Counsel for the appli ­cant on the other hand argued that one Ram Kailash has also lodged an F.I.R. against the accused applicant and three others for the offence under section 308 I.P.C. and if the accused applicant is re ­leased on bail, the life of the complainant shall be in danger. I considered over the matter. Since Ashok Tiwari has already been enlarged on bail, I feel that the accused applicant be also released on bail, of course, by impos ­ing certain conditions.

(3.) IN case any condition is violated the Courts concerned shall inform the High Court so that necessary steps may be taken for the cancellation of the bail.