IFETEKHAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard, the learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

(2.) It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant, that the applicant is said to have been found in possession of 200 gms of opium, of which no compliance of the mandatory provisions of the said Act has been done at the time of alleged recovery, there is no independent witness of the alleged recovery and the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. The applicant is in jail since 13.6.2010, and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

(3.) In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion about the merits of the case, let the applicant, Iftekhar involved in case crime no.322 of 2010, under Section 18/20 N.D.P.S. Act, P.S. Mirjapur, District.Shahjahanpur, be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-