SARVINDRA & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNTER affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.

(2.) HEARD the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the judgment and order dated 25.04.2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Meerut in S.T. No. 240 of 2006 State Vs. Kiran and others.

(3.) IN my opinion, prima facie, the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants have substance, therefore, it is just and expedient to exercise the discretion in favour of the appellant.