KEDAR NATH VERMA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This revision is directed against the order dated 11.5.2011 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad in Sessions Trial No. 967 of 2009 State v. Rajendra Verma under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, P.S. Kotwali, District-Ghaziabad, whereby the application under Section 91/173 (8) Code of Criminal Procedure filed on behalf of the revisionist-complainant was rejected.

(2.) The application was moved by the complainant praying for the following reliefs:

(3.) The application was rejected by Addl. Sessions Judge on the ground that the reliefs prayed for direction for further investigation, which is not permissible during the hearing of the sessions trial and the Sessions Judge has no right to exercise powers under Section 173(8) Code of Criminal Procedure and the complainant may, if so advised, get the relevant records summoned from the telephone company.