BRIJ BHUSHAN RAI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.K. Parekh, learned Counsel for the respon ­dents No. 3 and 4 as well as Sri A.S. Deval, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1.

(2.) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

(3.) The writ petition has been filed against the respondents No. 3 and 4 who are private finance company. Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that a Division Bench of this Court dismissed the writ petition No. 66283 of 2010, Dharmendra Kumar Yadav v. Manager, Commercial Auto Sales (P) Ltd. on 6.12.2010, taking the view that the writ petition against the private finance company, is not maintainable . Learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on judgment of the Apex Court in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur and others. 2007 (1) CRC 580. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have perused the record.