GAYA PRASAD Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicants -Appellants and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

(2.) WE have gone through the judgment of the courts below as well as lower court record.

(3.) THE learned Counsel for the applicants -Appellants argued that it is a case of circumstantial evidence and chain of circumstances is not complete. It has been argued that the prosecution witnesses, who have seen the deceased going with the accused ultimately termed hostile. Thus the case relates to circumstantial evidence and chain of which is not complete. It has been further submitted that the Appellants were on bail during course of trial and they did not misuse the liberty of bail granted to them and the appeals may take long time to reach to logical conclusion.