HARI PATI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON being unsuccessful in the writ petition to get his date of birth changed, the petitioner-appellant has preferred this appeal under Rule 5 of Chapter VIII of the Rules of the High Court, 1952.

(2.) THE petitioner-appellant filed a writ petition for issuance of mandamus to correct his date of birth as mentioned in his service book from 1st July, 1951 to 12th July, 1953.

(3.) THE submission of Sri Anil Tiwari, learned Counsel for the petitioner-appellant is that the learned single Judge has failed to take into consideration the mark-sheets of the petitioner-appellant of Class V and VIII which also mention his date of birth as 12th July, 1953 as has been mentioned in the High School certificate.