REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

STATE BANK OF INDIA Appellant

V/S

OM NARAIN AGRAWAL Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

N. SANTOSH V. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,HYDERABAD [REFERRED TO]
R.V. E. VENKATACHALA GOUNDER V. ARULMIGU VISWESARASWAMI AND V. R TEMPLE AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
NAGENDRA NATH BORA LIKHIRAM COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM RAFIULLAH KHAN VS. COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM:BHANURAM PAGU:BHANURAM PEGU:AMULYA PRASAD CHALIHA [REFERRED TO]
KUNDAN LAL RALLARAM VS. CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
NIBARAN CHANDRA BAG VS. MAHENDRA NATH CHUGHUL DECEASED AFTER HIM HIS HEIR AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD YUNUS VS. MOHAMMAD MUSTAQIM [REFERRED TO]
CANARA BANK VS. CANARA SALES CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. YUMNAM GOURAMANI SINGH [REFERRED TO]
LAXMIKANT REVCHAND BHOJWANI VS. PRATAPSING MOHANSINGH PARDESHI [REFERRED TO]
RENA DREGO VS. LALCHAND SONI [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA KASHINATH RAVAT VS. VINAYAK N JOSHI [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT BARREL AND DRUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY VS. AMIN CHAND PAYRELAL [REFERRED TO]
UNITED BANK OF INDIA CALCUTTA VS. ABHIJIT TEA CO PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
SURYA DEV RAI VS. RAM CHANDER RAI [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN BANK VS. ABS MARINE PRODUCTS PVT LTD [REFERRED TO]
ANIL RISHI VS. GURBAKSH SINGH [REFERRED TO]
HERO VINOTH VS. SESHAMMAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. RANJAN CHEMICALS LTD [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL RAZAK VS. MANGESH RAJARAM WAGLE [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. MANOJ KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
S.P. KANUDIA AND ANOTHER VS. CHAIRPERSON, DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BOTH the aforesaid writ petitions under Article 22State Bank of India v. Ranjan Chemicals Ltd. and another, 2006) 134 CC 24 (SC); 6 of Constitution of India have been filed by State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as "SBI") aggrieved by the order dated 19.4.2002 passed by Debt Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad (for short 'DRT'), dismissing TA No. 11/2000, State Bank of India v. Om Narain Agrawal and 11/2002, Om Narain Agrawal v. Regional Officer, State Bank of India and another and the Appellate order dated 4.10.2007 passed by Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad (for short 'DRAT') dismissing two Appeals No. R-167/02 and R-465/04 filed by SBI.

(2.) THE facts giving rise to the present dispute are as under.

(3.) RESPONDENT No. 1 in his written statement filed before DRT in the Bank's suit averred that he had never opened any account nor had withdrawn any amount, alleged as overdraft facility, and is not liable to pay the amount sought to be recovered from him. He said that there were three current accounts with the aforesaid Bank in the name of M/S Agrawal Sales Corporation, M/S Uma Sales Corporation and M/S Sudha Sales Corporation. RESPONDENT No. 1 had not opened any account bearing current account No. 2870 on 3.9.1991 or any other date latsoever.

Click here to view full judgment.

STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. OM NARAIN AGRAWAL

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address