REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Harendra Bahadur Singh Appellant

V/S

Upsrtc., Lucknow Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

ANIL KUMAR VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH PRASAD SINGH VERSUS STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
AVATAR SINGH VERSUS STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAMA TEWARI VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTAR PRADESH WAREHOUSING CORPORATION VS. VIJAY NARAYAN VAJPAYEE [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT HORTICULTURE EMPLOYEES UNION VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION DELHI [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT U P VS. PUSHPA SRIVASTAVA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. PIARA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LIMITED HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LIMITED VS. P SAMBASIVA RAO:S PRASADA RAO [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. MAHENDER SINGH [REFERRED TO]
TUSHAR ARUN GANDHI VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHATRUGHAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK CHIEF PERSONNEL DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. KUNJ BEHARI MISRA:SHANTI PRASAD GOEL [REFERRED TO]
RAMAKRISHNA KAMAT VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
A UMARANI VS. REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. NEERAJ AWASTHI [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL FERTILIZER LTD VS. SOMVIR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
UMA SHANKAR YADAV VS. REGISTRAR OF COOP SOCIETIES [REFERRED TO]
KAMLA CHARAN MISRA VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri U. K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Umesh Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation.

(2.) PRESENT writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred against the impugned order dismissing the petitioner from service in pursuance of the regular departmental inquiry. The petitioner who was a Conductor of Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (in short UPSRTC), was served with chargesheet dated 28.8.1993, whereby he was charged that during the surprise checking on 29.7.1993 at Sultanpur -Amethi Route, 61 passengers were found in the Bus and out of which 56 passengers were without tickets. Other charge is based on surprise inspection done on 18.8.1993 of Bus No.UHU 935, and 27 passengers and one cycle were found to be without ticket. In response to the chargesheet, the petitioner submitted reply. Along with the copy of statement of witnesses and other charges and relevant documents.

(3.) WHILE assailing the impugned order it has been submitted by Sri U. K. Srivastava learned counsel for the petitioner that since no oral inquiry was held, the submission of show cause notice along with the inquiry report shall not meet requirement of principles of natural justice. According to him, and the impugned order vitiates. He has relied upon the the cases reported in (1998) 7 SCC 84: Punjab National Bank and others. Vs. Kunj Behari Misra.

Click here to view full judgment.

HARENDRA BAHADUR SINGH Vs. UPSRTC., LUCKNOW

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address