GOKARAN LAL Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOTICE on behalf of the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 has been accepted by the learned Chief Standing Counsel. Mr. Virendra Yadav, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party No. 3, the same is taken on record. For the order proposed to be passed, I do not find it necessary to issue notice to the opposite party Nos. 3 to 8,

(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel and Mr. Virendra Yadav, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 3.

(3.) SECTION 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 is quoted below.