KANHAIYA GAUR Vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

(2.) THIS writ petition is directed against the order of dismissal dated 24.11.2010 passed by respondent no. 3 and appellate order dated 30/31.03.2011 dismissing petitioner's appeal.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has nowhere shown these findings perverse or contrary to record. He, however, says that confession could not have been treated to be an admission since it was against the provisions of Indian Evidence Act and was recorded under duress by representing the petitioner that in case he admits and reimbursed the amount, he would be left free.