VIKAS SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Out of four Petitioners, three are individuals and the other one is a company through one Dr. Harsh Mahajan claiming to be its Managing Director without any supporting affidavit of competency. The whole writ petition is not filed by any of the Petitioners but with, supporting affidavit of one Naunidh Singh Arora, aged about 25 years, son of Sri M.S. Arora, B-47, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi-17 claiming himself to be pairokar of the Petitioners, however, without disclosing any connection between himself and the Petitioners. Cloud cannot be dispelled from the mind of the Court about the questionable identity of the deponent. Moreover/this Court has already held that even a power of attorney holder has no right to get an order in the nature of writ of certiorari or mandamus, in Vice Admiral, Rustam Khusro Shapoor Ji Gandhi and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors., 2010 3 ADJ 319 . The relevant part of such judgment is quoted hereunder

(2.) For the purpose of better understanding, paragraph-7 of the writ petition is quoted below:

(3.) Apart from that from the facts of the case it appears to us that the Petitioners are socially well established and/or financially affluent, who inclined to get allotment of plots of land for farm house in the open green space of Noida under the scheme known as "Open-Ended Scheme For Development of Farm House on Agricultural Land-2010". The Petitioners, being signatories therein, have agreed to fulfil the terms and conditions prescribed in the application for allotment of such plots. Bottom of such application comprises clause of declaration, which is as follows: