LAWS(ALL)-2011-3-160

S P MITTAL Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On March 23, 2011
S.P.MITTAL Appellant
V/S
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Sunil Sharma, learned Counsel for Petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Respondents.

(2.) Petitioner has sought writ of mandamus commanding the Respondents to pay medical reimbursement of Rs. 17,146/- and 6,570/- alongwith interest without insisting on the original medical vouchers and further to conduct a high level enquiry to find out the person responsible for loss of original bill vouchers.

(3.) The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present dispute are as under.