CONSTABLE NO. 669 CIVIL POLICE SURESH KUMAR S/O T.R. YADAV 8 Vs. DIRECTOR GENERAL POLICE U.P. LKO. & ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manjeev Shukla, learned State Counsel.

(2.) THE facts, in brief, of the present case are that the petitioners are working as Constable in U.P. Police. Initially they were transferred out side the range of their present place of posting, as such for redressal of their grievance, approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No. 1913 (S/S) of 2011( Ram Prakash Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others), disposed of vide order dated 23.5.2011. The relevant portion of the same is quoted as under:

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners submits that impugned order of transfer is illegal and arbitrary in nature as the same has been passed in mid session and their children are studying in Highschool and Intermediate and if they are compelled to go on the transferred place studies of children will suffer in the present era of competition, so the impugned order of transfer beside being illegal, against principles of natural justice and in violation of law as laid down by this Court in the case of Dr. A.K. Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others, 2005 (23) LCD 1055 has held as under: