KAMAL KAUSHAL TIWARI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner is working as a Constable. He appeared in SI Rankers' Examination, 2010. His one of the answersheet could not be examined and Zero mark has been awarded on the ground that the petitioner has not filled up the OMR sheet.

(2.) The contention of the petitioner is that admittedly the OMR sheet has not been filled up by the petitioner, but the Invigilator has filled up the question paper book series in the answersheet and, therefore, the object of filling up the answersheet is achieved. Thus, the petitioner's answersheet should be examined.

(3.) I see no reason to take a different view as taken in the aforesaid Writ Petition. Following the view taken in the aforesaid Writ Petition, I do not find any merit in the present writ petition. The writ petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. .