YATENDRA KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.

(2.) However, in the circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the petitioner move an application for surrender before the court concerned within three weeks from today, the Magistrate concerned shall fix a date about two weeks thereafter for the appearance of the petitioner and in the meantime release the petitioner on interim bail on such terms and conditions as the court concerned considers fit and proper till the date fixed for the disposal of the regular bail. The court concerned shall also direct the Public Prosecutor to seek instructions from the investigating officer by the date fixed and also give an opportunity of hearing to the informant and thereafter decide the regular bail application of the petitioners in accordance with the observations of the Full Bench of this Court in Amrawati and another v. State of UP, 2004 57 AllLR 290, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of UP, 2009 2 Crimes(SC) 4and reiterated by the Division Bench of this Court in Sheoraj Singh alias Chuttan v. State of UP and others, 2009 65 AllCriC 781. If further instructions are needed or if adjournment of the case on the date fixed for hearing becomes unavoidable, the Court may fix another date, and may also extend the earlier order granting interim bail, if it deems fit.

(3.) In case the petitioner fail to appear before the court concerned on the dates fixed or they fail to cooperate with the investigating officer during interrogation, it will be open to the Public Prosecutor to move an application for cancelling the order of interim/final bail and the Court concerned may pass an appropriate order on merits.