ABHIMANYU SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the record. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 26.9.2009 passed by respondent No. 2 in Appeal No. 12 of 2010 and order dated 26.11.2010 passed by respondent No. 3 whereby petitioner's application for grant of regular stage carriage permit to ply his vehicle from Ghazipur to Mardah via Hanshrajpur has been rejected.

(2.) The authorities below have observed that there are already enough vehicles on the route and any further addition may result in making it a racing ground which may result in more accidents on the route. The decision of the Apex Court in Mithlesh Garg v. Union of India, 1992 AIR(SC) 443 has been considered by this Court in Mukesh Kumar v. Regional Transport Authority, 2003 2 AWC 1106 , and in paras 8, 9 and 10 this Court said:

(3.) The issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the aforesaid decision.