UTKARSH SAHU ALIAS SANU Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the revisionist and Mr. Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

(2.) THE allegation against the revisionist is that he committed the murder of his father and grand mother being under the guardianship of his mother, which establishes that the mother has no command over the mental thought of the revisionist. The revisionist is a juvenile, therefore, the consideration of his application for bail is guided by Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Section 12 is extracted below:

(3.) WITH the aforesaid observation, the revision is dismissed.