LAWS(ALL)-2011-2-56

SATYA PRAKASH PANDEY Vs. DEV BRAT MISHRA

Decided On February 02, 2011
SATYA PRAKASH PANDEY Appellant
V/S
DEV BRAT MISHRA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a First Appeal From Order under Order XLIII Rule 1 (w) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

(2.) HEARD Sri Yogesh Agarwal, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Vinod Swaroop, learned senior counsel for the sole respondent.

(3.) ACCORDING to Sri Agarwal the first reason cited in the impugned order is clearly not a reason for review as contemplated under Order XLVII, but at the most such illegal finding on a mis-reading of a document could be the subject matter of appeal.