DAYAWATI Vs. D D C BAGHPAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for the contesting Respondents.

(2.) The issue is very short, as the matter has now to be examined in the light of the earlier judgment of this Court dated 10th September 2007 in writ petition No. 16761 of 2007. The judgment being precise and which also details the facts necessary for adjudication, is being gainfully reproduced here under:

(3.) Sri Tyagi learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that when the matter was remitted to the Deputy Director of Consolidation, the Petitioner had taken full care to explain the delay in the grounds of revision and the delay having been explained and the obvious consequences of losing property being evident, it was just and equitable for the Deputy Director of Consolidation to have condoned the delay taking a liberal view in the matter. He therefore submits that the impugned order deserves to be set aside and the delay as prayed for deserves to be condoned.