REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ZILA PANCHAYAT MATHURA Appellant

V/S

DY LABOUR COMMISSIONER Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT TELEGRAPH (TRAFFIC) BHOPAL V. SANTOSH KUMAR SEAL AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
R M YELLATTI VS. ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE BRASSWARE CORPORATION LTD VS. UDAI NARAIN PANDEY [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. MAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. RAM SAHAI [REFERRED TO]
UTTRANCHAL FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VS. M C JOSHI [REFERRED TO]
MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATION VS. TRIBHUBAN [REFERRED TO]
MAHBOOB DEEPAK VS. NAGAR PANCHYAT GAJRAULA [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. ASHOK KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
SITA RAM VS. MOTI LAL NEHRU FARMERS TRAINING INSTITUTE [REFERRED TO]
JAGBIR SINGH VS. HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD [REFERRED TO]
HARJINDER SINGH VS. PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
KRISHAN SINGH VS. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD [REFERRED TO]
ANOOP SHARMA VS. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Krishna Mohan, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Rajesh Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3.

(2.) WRIT petition is directed against award dated 9.12.2002 of Labour Court, U.P. Agra in Adjudication Case No. 83 of 1997 where by it has held that since termination of workman amounts to retrenchment and has been made in violation of Section 6 N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (here in after referred as '1947 Act'), respondent No. 3 (the workman) is entitled for reinstatement with effect from 23.5.1995 with full back wages.

(3.) THE aforesaid reference was made for adjudication of respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 3 workman filed written statement alleging that he was engaged as 'Mali' in Zila Panchayat, Mathura on 1.1.1993 and was paid wages @ Rs. 1050/- per month. He was terminated by the Chairman, Zila Panchayat on 23rd of May, 1995 without following procedure prescribed under Section 6 N of 1947 Act and therefore the termination is illegal.

Click here to view full judgment.

ZILA PANCHAYAT MATHURA Vs. DY LABOUR COMMISSIONER AGRA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address