(1.) Case called out in the revised list. Learned Counsel for the parties are present.
(2.) So far as the contention for allowing the maintenance allowance from the date of the order is concerned, the learned Magistrate has given cogent reasons for granting the maintenance allowance and as such, no interference is required by this Court.
(3.) So far as subsequent enhancement of the salary in the year 2009 is concerned, the revisionist is at liberty to move an application under Section 127, Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate concerned for the enhancement of the maintenance allowance.