MANISH KUMAR MUSADDI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) The further submission of learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that Under Rule 10 of the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules, 1974) State Government has power to remove difficulties and the State Government is empowered to consider the claim of the Petitioner for compassionate appointment.

(3.) Learned Counsel for the Petitioner relied upon a decision in Smt. Geeta Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors., 2008 5 ADJ 345 in which it has been observed that if the person who is claiming compassionate appointment is a needy person, then the Respondent authority must consider the case of such candidate sympathetically and provide compassionate appointment to such needy person.