SATYENDRA KUMAR PANDEY Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the order of Commandant, TRG Central Industrial Security Force, National Industrial Security Academy, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the "Commandant"), by which the offer of appointment has been withdrawn.

(2.) Learned Assistant Solicitor General raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition is not maintainable at Allahabad as the impugned order has been passed by the Commandant, Hyderbabad.

(3.) In support of the contention, he relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of jagveer Singh v. Union of INdia and others, 2006 62 AllLR 902and the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Namita Singh v. State of U.P. and others, in Special Appeal No. 39 of 2009 decided on 5.2.2009.