RAM VILAS Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri. A.K. Narain, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Atul Sharma, Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 1.

(2.) THIS petition has a chequered history relating to the claim of mutation over the holding of deceased Chhedi son of Veer as disclosed in the pedigree contained in paragraph 4 of the writ petition and to that extent having not been disputed in paragraph 5 of the counter -affidavit. There is a variance between the parties on the pedigree and the claim of succession.

(3.) THIS claim of Smt. Muraiya was contested by Chhedi son of Gokula contending that Smt. Muraiya is the wife of one Narsing and she is not the widow of Chhedi son of Veer, nor Salhanti is her daughter.