OMKAR SINGH Vs. UP ZILADHIKARI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order, by which sale has been confirmed in favour of the auction purchaser on 02.02.2000.

(2.) THE petitioner claims that he had taken certain loans which could not be repaid within time and therefore, recovery certificate was issued against him which was the subject matter and was challenge before this Court in Writ Petition No. 4433 of 2000. This writ petition was decided by this Court by judgment and order 31.01.2000. In the said judgment the relief was granted to the petitioner and he was permitted to deposit the entire amount in three equal installments within six months. THE first installment was to be paid within a period of two months from the date of passing of the order. According to the petitioner the entire amount was deposited in terms of the order of this Court.

(3.) I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4. In my view, before the petitioner filed his application, bringing on record the order passed by this Court the sale had already been confirmed in favour of respondent no. 4 on 02.02.2000.