AKHILESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri R.C. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) ONE of the ground for non suiting the petitioners for substantive appointment on the post of Collection Amin is that the average recovery against the target determined by authorities concerned in the last four Fasals by petitioners is less than average 70% and, therefore, petitioners' service cannot be said to be satisfactory as contemplated under Rule 5 of U.P. Collection Amins' Service Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the "1974 Rules").

(3.) SIMILAR is the position in respect to Sri Mohammad ldu and Sri Shesh Bahadur, who are at serial Nos. 5 and 16 respectively in seniority list. Their recovery percentage in respect to columns Nos. 12 and 13 are as under: <IMG>JUDGEMENT_76_ADJ3_2011Image3.jpg</IMG>