CHUNNA ALIAS BRIJESH Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. S.N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

(2.) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that once the matter was investigated and no case is found to have been made out under Section 307 of the Code after investigation the complaint filed by the complainant for trial of the petitioner under Section 307 of the Code is absolutely misuse of the process of the Court.

(3.) After going through the facts of the case as well as the settled view on the point, I am of the view that if the complainant was aggrieved with the police report, it was open for her to move a protest petition before the learned Magistrate instead of taking a different recourse i.e. instituting the complaint case. Therefore, I hereby issue direction to the learned Magistrate concerned to treat the complaint in question as a protest application in the Criminal Case No. 10 of 2008 arising out of Case Crime No. 392/07, under Section 337 of the Code, Police Station- Pali, Hardoi and proceed with the aforesaid application and pass an appropriate order after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. The order impugned dated 6th of May, 2008 as well as all consequential orders are hereby quashed and petition is disposed of finally.