JAYPAL AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the Appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

(2.) SUMMON the lower Court record.

(3.) IT is contended by the learned Counsel for the Appellants that according to the medical evidence the injuries were found simple in nature except injury No. 6 and 7 for which the X -ray was advised but no fracture was found. There is great inconsistency in the medical evidence with the statements of the complainant and the injured witness. The complainant is not an eye witness of the said incident. The Appellants have been convicted for two years simple imprisonment under Section 324 IPC and no case was found under Section 308 IPC. There is no likelihood of early hearing of the appeal in near future. Now the Appellants are on interim bail after their conviction i.e. 11.4.2011.