MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The applicant is an employee of Rohilkhand University.

(2.) A first information report was lodged by the victim on 14.12.2010 with the aforesaid allegations that the applicant who is a Computer Operator in the Pharmacy Department of the University, had surreptitiously prepared some clips when the victim used to visit his residence ,as the father of the victim and the accused are well known to each other. Having prepared those clips he started blackmailing the victim, and after her marriage, tried to extract money from her threatening her with dire consequences. The applicant came to lodge the F.I.R. only after her in-laws viewed the said clipping and feeling humiliated she decided to commit suicide. She however gave up the idea on persuasion as per her statement recorded later on.

(3.) Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail and he submits that in view of the fact that the applicant is an employee of the University and has behaved in a manner that he does not deserve any bail as the statement of the witnesses indicates that the applicant has indulged in such activities with other females in the University.