PRAVEEN KUMAR Vs. COLLECTOR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of the Collector dated 6.6.2011 Annexure-6 to the writ petition whereby it has been held that the revision filed under Section 333 of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act in relation to the dispute raised by the petitioner was not maintainable and accordingly the revision has been rejected.

(2.) The petitioners are the sons of Ram Raksha Pal Singh. The Tahsildar had proceeded against the father of the petitioners alleging unauthorised occupation of Gaon Sabha land in proceedings under Section 122B of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act. An order came to be passed on 14.3.2011 in the said proceedings. The petitioners were admittedly not parties to the said proceedings nor any notice had been issued to the petitioners by the Tahsildar. While proceeding to decide the matter the Tahsildar had made certain observations about the support being extended by the petitioners to their father in relation to the unauthorised occupation which was subject-matter of the said dispute.

(3.) Aggrieved by the said comments contained in the order under Section 122B of the 1950 Act, the petitioners came up before this Court in Writ Petition No. 26096 of 2011 which was disposed of on 10.5.2011 by the following order :