SATISH MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

(2.) THE instant petition has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of complaint Case No. 647 of 2010? under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, police station George Town, district Allahabad pending in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.10, Allahabad.

(3.) PER contra the learned A.G.A. has contended that the disputed question of facts will be considered by the court below during trial after leading evidence by the parties, therefore, the present proceedings initiated against the applicant cannot be said to be illegal. The prayer for quashing the proceeding is liable to be refused.?