RAJEEV MOHAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Rajeev Mohan in person and Sri Govind Krishana, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 2 and 3, Sri Santosh Kumar Pandey and Sri Saumitra Singh, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents, and Sri S.K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondents appearing in Writ Petition No. 23672 of 2006.

(2.) THESE two writ petitions have been connected and listed together as order of the Central Administrative Tribunal have been challenged in both these writ petitions.

(3.) THE petitioner who appears in person submits that the petitioner and respondents have already been promoted as Income Tax officer and they are due for next higher post as Assistant Commissioner (Income Tax). The Departmental Promotion Committee is going to take place for promotion of the eligible candidates to the next higher grade on 26.12.2011 & 27.12.2011 and the private respondents are likely to be considered for promotion on the post of Assistant Commissioner (Income Tax) and in the event the petitioner is not permitted to participate in the consideration of promotion he shall suffer irreparable loss.