KISHORI Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

(2.) THE petitioner claims allotment over plot no. 207. A copy of the lease alleged to have been executed in favour of the petitioner is Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The same apparently does not indicate any approval by the competent authority.

(3.) THE said allotment has now been upset, and aggrieved against the order passed by the authorities, the petitioner is before this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, contending that the allotment was valid and the same stood regularized under the order dated 7.8.2010.