GOKUL DAIRY Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Pankaj Bhatia. Advocate, who has appeared for respondent No. 4 and also perused the record.

(2.) BY means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners pray for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamuscommanding the respondents to get the claim of the bank satisfied first by sale of properties, which have been mortgaged, the details of which, are stated to have been given in the recovery certificate, contained in Annexure -3, not to use any other coercive measure, more particularly, the arrest of the petitioners till the claim of the respondent bank is not satisfied by sale of the properties. Further, to command the respondents not to initiate any recovery proceedings in pursuance of the recovery certificate, contained in Annexure -2 to the writ petition.

(3.) THE present petition has again been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the above mentioned reliefs.