ASHUTOSH PANDEY Vs. SECRETARY DURGA NARAIN COLLEGE FATEHGARH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel appearing for the parties.

(2.) PETITIONER , by means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has challenged the order dated 18.10.2001 passed by the Secretary of the Managing Committee of the respondent college, respondent No. 1, Annexure -5 to the writ petition purporting to punish the petitioner, which according to the petitioner has not been done in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Statute 21.02 (1) of the Kshatrapati Sahuji Maharaj Kanpur University. Kanpur.

(3.) IN my opinion, the objections of the learned standing counsel are correct. If what the petitioner has stated that there is no punishment imposed by the respondents -management, then petitioner should have approached the District Inspector of Schools that this punishment has been imposed without prior approval of the District Inspector of Schools and if it has been approved, then an appeal lies under Statute 21.02. In this view of the matter, this writ petition at this stage is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. LegalCrystal - Indian Law Search Engine - www.legalcrystal.com