(1.) V. K. Chaturvedi, J. Pursuant to order dated 13-12-2000, Revisionist, Vishal Tandon and opposite party Smt. Priyanka Tandon are present in Court today. On being enquired from the Court. Smt. Priyanka Tandon stated that just after her marriage, revisionist started ill-treat ing her on account of demand of dowry and she was also beaten by him and was turned out from the house and now she is living with her parents and she does not want to live with her husband. Revisionist, Vishal stated before this Court that he is jobless and is doing nothing. In view of the state ment of both the parties, there is no pos sibility of reconciliation.
(2.) THIS revision is preferred against the judgment and order dated 14-9-2000 passed by Ilnd A. C. J. M. , Saharanpur in criminal case No. 192 of 1998, Smt. Priyanka v. Vishal Tandon by which ap plication of opposite party, Smt. Priyanka Tandon under Section 125 Cr. PC. has been allowed and the revisionist was directed to pay her maintenance al lowance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month from the date of order i. e. 14-9-2000.
(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the opposite party contended that after her marriage, revisionist started ill- treating her on ac count of demand of dowry and was also beaten and turned out of the hosue by the revisionist and now she is living with her parents. She is doing nothing. As such, she is unable to maintain herself.