LALLEY Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision petition, preferred against the judgment and order, dated 8-2-1991 passed the learned Additional Commissioner, Jhansi Division, Jhansi, arising out of an order dated 24-10-1989 passed by the learned trial Court in the proceedings under Section 198 (4) of the U. P. Z. A & LR Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

(2.) BRIEF and relevant facts of the case are that these proceedings under Section 198 (4) of the Act were initiated, on the tehsil report for cancellation of the lease, granted in favour of the revisionist for an area 6. 14 acres, on the ground of the fact that the lease holder was minor at the time of the aforesaid allotment an others minor grounds. The learned trial Court, after completing the requisite formalities, found that the revisionist was minor at the time of the aforesaid allotment and in Addition to this, his family had sufficient land before the aforesaid allotment and canceled the aforesaid lease on 24-10- 1989. Aggrieved by this order, a revision was preferred. The learned Additional Commissioner has upheld the aforesaid order, passed by the learned trial Court and dismissed the revision too on 8-2- 1991. Hence this second revision petition.

(3.) IN view of the aforesaid discussions, I come to the conclusion that this revision petition, having no force, is liable to be dismissed and the orders, passed by the learned Courts, below, deserve to be maintained. No force is found in the contentions, raised by the learned Counsel for the revisionist.