RADHA KANT DUBEY Vs. VTH ADJ KANPUR NAGAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) O. P. Garg, J. Heard Sri K. K. Tripathi learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Rajesh Tandon, Senior Advocate, assisted by Km. Rama Goyal for the landlord respondent No. 3.

(2.) THE respondent No. 3 filed a petitioner under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act, No. 13 of 1972 which was allowed by the Prescribed Authority by order dated 2-3-1992. Against this order the present petition preferred an Appeal No. 131 of 1992 under Section 22 of the Act which was dismissed on 18-1-2001.

(3.) AFTER the above order was passed Sri K. K, Tripathi learned Counsel for the petitioner urged that sometime may be allowed to the petitioner to shift to another accommodation by making alter native arrangement. Sri Rajesh Tandon, learned Counsel for the landlord respon dent No. 3 states that if some reasonable time is allowed to the petitioner the landlord shall have no objection.