JAI SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. K. Agarwal, J. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned AGA.

(2.) IT is contended by learned Counsel for the appellant that the injury No. 1 is the only substantial injury which has been at tributed to a blunt object. Two persons were attributed role of using a blunt ob ject. Injury No. 2 is a firearm injury and looking to the dimension of the injury No. 1 it could also be either by a fall or by grazing pellets. The story as contained in the FIR runs in the adverse direction and is not supported by the medical evidence.

(3.) IN the circumstances let the ap plicant be enlarge on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahjahanpur in Case Crime No. 23 of 2001 under Sec-tiori 3021. P. C. Police Station Mandanapur District Shahjahanpur. Bail granted. .