ASHOK KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of the petition on hand under Article 226 of the Const. the petitioners seek issuance of directions to the respondents to declare the results of selection held by the U.P. State Electricity Board for the posts of supervisor re-designated as Junior Engineer (Thermal) pursuant to, the advertisement dated 19.10.93 and 20.10.93 published in different Newspapers. The petitioners herein appeared in the test held by the U.P. State Electricity Board pursuant to the advertisement aforestated. Though the results were formally not declared, the petitioners it is alleged, have come to know that a merit-list was prepared in which the name of the petitioners also figured amongst candidates selected for appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (Thermal) for Anpara 'B' Thermal Power Station. Sonbhadra, the candidates lower in order of merit have been appointed while the petitioners have been denied appointments. The case of the respondent is that the U.P. State Electricity Board which had conducted the selection is no longer in existence as a result of the U.P. Electricity Reforms Transfer Scheme, 2000, which was notified vide notification No. 149/P-1/2000-24. Lucknow, dated Jan. 14, 2000 pursuant to which the State Electricity Board has since been truncated and trifurcated into three distinct legal entities namely, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. and the U.P. Rajya Vidutya Utpadan Nigam Ltd. and the U.P. Jal Vidutya Utpadan Nigam Ltd. Under the U.P. Electricity Reforms Transfer Scheme, 2000, Anpara Thermal Power Station has become a part of the U.P. Rajya Vidutya Utpadan Nigam Ltd. and the Nigam is under no obligation to declare the result of the selection held by the U.P. Electricity Board. It is also alleged that posts of Junior Engineer (Thermal) for Anpara, 'B' Thermal Power Station are yet to be created. The vacant posts under the Board, according to the respondents, stood abolished w.e:f. Jan. 14, 2000. Reliance has been placed on Section 23(7) of the U.P. State Electricity Board Reforms Act, 1999. Section 23, in so far as it is relevant, reads as under:

(2.) A perusal of the provisions aforestated would be eloquent of the fact that upon the transfer scheme coming into force the posts in the Board of all the personnel whose services were to be transferred under the scheme, stood abolished with effect from the date of transfer i.e. 14.1.2000 and the Board having lost its entity due to its trifurcation into Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd.; the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidutya Utpadan Nigam Ltd. and the Uttar Pradesh Jal Vidutya Utpadan Nigam Ltd. is no longer amenable to the writ jurisdiction. It is implicit in the second proviso to Sub-section (7) of Section 23 of the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board Reforms Act, 1999 that the vacancies in the Board lying unfilled on the date of transfer, stood automatically abolished. The Director Corporate Planning of the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. by his letter dated Jan. 22, 2000 has made it clear that the unfilled posts under the erstwhile Board stood automatically abolished under Section 23(7) of the Act aforestated.

(3.) The Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyuta Utpadan Nigam Ltd. to which Anpara Thermal Power Station, Sonbhadra has been transferred under the transfer scheme is hide-bound by no obligation to declare the result of the selection held by the erstwhile Board for the posts of Junior Engineer Thermal nor have any rights accrued to the petitioners qua the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyuta Utpadan Nigam Ltd. or the Corporation to seek declaration of the results of the selection made by the erstwhile Board in respect of the posts of Junior Engineer Thermal for Anpara 'B' Thermal Power Station, Sonbhadra. It may be opposite to spell out here that even selection docs not confer an indefeasible right to be appointed. There may be legitimate ground on which appointment may be denied to the selected candidates. In this perspective, even if it be assumed that the petitioners were selected for appointment, the selection has been rendered otiose in the altered circumstances. Mere fact that some of the candidates whose names figure in the select list, were appointed by the Board, does not open the portcuillis to enable the petitioners to enter the service of the Nigam, for the selection conducted by the Board did not confer any right upon the petitioners to seek appointment as against the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidutya Utpadan Nigam Ltd. to which Anpara 'B' Thermal Power Station has been transferred under the Transfer Scheme vide Notification dated Jan. 14, 2000. In the circumstances, the petitioners are not entitled to any relief.