REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ATIQUE AHMED Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

KING V. MINISTER OF HEALTH [REFERRED TO]
CONSOLIDATION OFFICER LTD. V. MINISTER OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING [REFERRED TO]
REY V. BRIGHTON CORPORATION EXPARTA SHOOSMITH [REFERRED TO]
R P KAPUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
P V JAGANNATH RAO VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
S N SHARMA VS. BIPEN KUMAR TIWARI [REFERRED TO]
PRABHU DAYAL DEORAH RAJ KUMAR DEORAH VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAMRUP:DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAMRUP [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NEW DELHI DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. LILA D BHAGAT:SARDARI LAL AND THE STATE:R S BAJWA 2 THE STATE [REFERRED TO]
NANDINISATPATHY VS. P L DANI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. SWAPAN KUMAR GUHA:SANCHAITA INVESTMENTS [REFERRED TO]
SHEONANDAN PASWAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
MADHAVRAO JIWAJIRAO SCINDIA VS. SAMBHAJIRAO CHANDROJTRAO ANGRE [REFERRED TO]
BHASKAR CHATTORAJ VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. BHAJAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. PIRTHI CHAND [REFERRED TO]
PEPSI FOODS LIMITED VS. SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE [REFERRED TO]
RAM LAL YADAV VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRA PRASAD SAHA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All these three writ petitions which are being heard together have been placed today for further hearing.

(2.) In Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 1911 of 2001 the prayer of the petitioner Atique Ahmad, who happens to be a Member of Legislative Assembly for the last 12 years continuously and claims to be popular equally between Hindus and Muslims belonging to Apna Dal, has come up with following prayers :-

(3.) On 20-7-2001 when we had proceeded to hear Sri Siddharth Shankar Ray, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the prayers made in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1911 of 2001 and Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 2391 of 2001 to some extent the learned Government Advocates Sri Mahendra Pratap as well as Sri Tripathi, appearing on behalf of the respondents raised a preliminary objection to our hearing challenging the very maintainability of these writ petitions.

Click here to view full judgment.

ATIQUE AHMED Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address