SHAILENDRA KUMAR ARORA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the order dated 8-11-1999 whereby respondent No. 3 rejected the application of the petitioners for grant of interim injunction and the order of the appellate authority dated 13-9-2000 affirming the said order in appeal.

(2.) BRIEFLY stated the facts are that the petitioners filed Suit No. 811 of 1998 for declaration with the allegation that Shailendra Kumar Arora, petitioner No. 1, is adopted by Chandra Prakash Arora, petitioner No. 2, and for permanent in junction restraining respondents No. 4 and 5 (natural father and mother of petitioner No. 1) from removing or getting removed petitioner No. 1 from the custody of petitioner No. 2 by any means what soever. They also filed an application for interim injunction restraining respon dents No. 4 and 5 from removing petitioner No. 1 from the custody of petitioner No. 2.

(3.) I have heard Dr. H. N. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioners.