MOHAMMAD JAMEEL Vs. NOOR AHMAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. K. Yog, J. Heard Sri Rajesh Tandon, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Rama Goel Advocate on behalf of the petitioners and Sri M. S. Haq, Advocate on behalf of contesting plaintiff-respondents Noor Ahmad who has appeared as Caveator- appellant. Learned Counsel for the parties agreed that there is no necessity to send notice to the defendant respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 as their interest is fully represented and protected by the petitioners and further writ petition may be finally decided at the admission stage itself.

(2.) IN view of the above, the writ petition is being finally heard and decided.

(3.) IT has also come on record that Smt. Mahmooda Bibi had failed to make deposit under Section 20 (4) of the Act in spite of the Court order dated 3-1-1992 which permitted deposits to be made by Smt. Mahmooda Bibi/defendant No. 1 at her own risk.