HAUSALA PRASAD DUBEY Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Rathi, J. This is a petition under Section 482 Crpc for quashing the charge-sheet dated 21-12-2000, Annexure 6 to the petition and also the proceedings on its basis of the Criminal Case No. 284 of 2001 pending in the court of CJM, Mirzapur against the petitioner.

(2.) I have heard Shri K. S. Tiwari, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the AGA. The facts of the case are as follows.

(3.) THE argument of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is totally mis-conceived. Section 300 Crpc provides regarding bar of the second trial. It does not apply in the present case at all. Even if the proceedings before disciplinary committee of Bar Council is a judicial proceedings it is only for the purposes of Sections 197 and 228 IPC which has no relevanc. THE punishment by the disciplinary proceeding cannot bar the prosecution and punishment for offences under the provisions of the IPC.