ISHTIYAQ AHMAD Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Anil Kumar Singh, counsel for the applicant in revision and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

(2.) This revision is directed against the order dated 4-7-2001 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Court No. 12), Azamgarh dismissing the application to release the vehicle (Truck No. U.P. 42-B-7671) in his favour.

(3.) The vehicle in question was seized by the police in case crime No. 224 of 2001, under Section 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of U.P. Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, P.S. Phoolpur, district Azamgarh. The seizure was reported to the Court below. The applicant claiming himself to be registered owner of the said vehicle moved an application for releasing the said vehicle in his interim custody. That application has been rejected by the Court below on the ground that the truck owner has not produced the driver in the Court and since the driver was still absconding, there was no justification in releasing the truck in question. The reason assigned by the Court below for rejecting the applicant's application for interim release of the vehicle in question is wholly unjustified. In the affidavit filed in support of the revision it is stated that the said vehicle is lying in open sky at the police station. Learned counsel further placed reliance on the Apex Court decision in Ashok Kumar v. State of Bihar, 2000 (41) ACC 418 : (2001 AIR SCW 2314).